Royce Reed Net Worth 2021, Canton Man Shot, Articles E

. answered Jul 2, 2014 at 10:14. How long does it take to publish a paper in Journal? In replying to the referees comments, authors are advised to use language that would not cause offence when their paper is shown again to the referees, and to bear in mind that if a point was not clear to the referees and/or editors, it is unlikely that it would be clear to the nonspecialist readers of Nature. After going through the reviewers comments, the editor will make a decision about your manuscript. . [CDATA[// > Peer review comments, cover letter and more. The Journals and Editorial press office distributes embargoed mailings highlighting upcoming content to registered journalists six days in advance of publication. A vital, and often overlooked, aspect of peer review is that in the current system, peer reviewers are normally not paid for their work. Editor decision started might sound like the editor is going to bench reject your paper, but thats not necessarily the case. If the reviewers wish to be named their names will appear in alphabetical order at the end of the paper in a statement as below: Any reviewers that wish to remain anonymous will be acknowledged using a slightly modified statement: If no reviewers agree to be named, we will still acknowledge their valuable service using the statement below: Nature makes decisions about submitted papers as rapidly as possible. Sometimes they are more busy. While editing corrects the structure of your article whereas a peer reviewer gives you an extensive analysis. At times, they may ask you to revise and resubmit the manuscript. Under these circumstances, further experiments or technical work are usually required to address some or all of the referees concerns, and revised papers are sent back to some or all of the referees for a second opinion. Weigh all of your options and look at the merits of the rejection. Either rejection or sending it out for review. How do I align things in the following tabular environment? What does this mean and should I contact the editor? b. I regret giving them his address. When a journal displays the decision in process status, it means that the editorial board is in the process of making the final decision about your paper. Because the 'quality' of a manuscript is not a linear variable, editorial decisions invariably have a subjective component. It is up to the editor whether to accept or reject. Although many decisions appear clear-cut, others are necessarily based on subtle distinctions between papers, and referees or editors can sometimes make mistakes. PIs gone AWOL? The journal editor will probably make their final decision about your paper based on the changes you now make to the work, as well as the contents, its originality, and the way you write your cover letter. Answer: The status Decision in process after Under review means that all the reviews have come in and the editor is evaluating your paper based on the reviewers comments. Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field.